Warning: By their nature, text files cannot include scanned images 
and tables. The process of converting documents to text only can 
cause formatting changes and misinterpretation of the contents 
can sometimes result. Wherever possible you should refer to the 
original PDF version of this document.

CAIRNGORMS NATIONAL PARK AUTHORITY
OUTCOME OF THE PLANNING COMMITTEE CALL-IN
held electronically
on 15th April 2011
PARTICIPATING MEMBERS
Peter Argyle, 
Eleanor Mackintosh,
Angela Douglas, 
Ian Mackintosh,
Jaci Douglas, 
Mary McCafferty,
Dave Fallows, 
Willie McKenna,
Katrina Farquhar,
Gordon Riddler,
Marcus Humphrey, 
Gregor Rimell,
Gregor Hutcheon, 
Brian Wood,
Bob Kinnaird,
Allan Wright,

APOLOGIES:
Duncan Bryden,
David Green,

NO RESPONSE RECEIVED:
Kate Howie


1. The CNPA has taken a decision to trail the use of electronic systems 
to carry out its Call-in meetings.

2. Members were able to view the Call-in presentation on the CNPA website
(www.cairngorms.co.uk) between 12.00 noon on Wednesday 13th April and 12.00 noon
on Friday 15th April 2011.

3. Apologies were received from the above Members.

Page 2

DECLARATION OF INTEREST BY MEMBERS ON ANY ITEMS APPEARING
ON THE CALL-IN PRESENTATION

4. Angela Douglas declared an indirect interest in Planning Application No. 11/096/CP, due
to knowing Bob Kinnaird, fellow Board Member employed by Glenmore Lodge.

5. Katrina Farquhar declared a direct interest in Planning Application No. 11/109/CP &
11/116/CP, due to the application site neighbouring her parent's property. She also
declared a direct interest in Planning Application No. 11/115/CP, due to the Applicants
being customers of her Employer, HM Sheridan Butchers.

6. Bob Kinnaird declared a direct interest in Planning Application No. 11/096/CP, due to
being employed by Glenmore Lodge.

7. Gordon Riddler declared an indirect interest in Planning Application No. 11/102/CP, due
to knowing the Applicant through community work. He also declared an indirect
interest in Planning Application No. 11/115/CP, due to being a customer of the
Applicants business.

PLANNING APPLICATION CALL-IN DECISIONS
(Electronic Presentation, prepared by Mary Grier, Planning Officer)

8. 11/095/CP - No Call-in

9. 11/096/CP - No Call-in

10. 11/097/CP - Agricultural Shed

At Ashfield, Drumguish, Kingussie
The decision was to call-in the application for the following reason:

The proposed development of a structure that is substantial in
overall scale, mass and height and is proposed to be located in
close proximity to existing residential properties within a
traditional rural hamlet, is considered to raise issues in respect of
general amenity, landscape and natural heritage and is therefore of
significance to the aims of the National Park.

11. 11/098/CP - No Call-in

12. 11/099/CP - No Call-in

13. 11/100/CP - No Call-in

14. 11/101/CP - No Call-in

15. 11/102/CP - No Call-in

16. 11/103/CP - No Call-in

17. 11/104/CP - No Call-in

18. 11/105/CP - No Call-in

19. 11/106/CP - No Call-in

20. 11/107/CP - No Call-in

21. 11/108/CP - No Call-in

22. 11/109/CP - No Call-in

23. 11/110/CP - Variation to Condition 1 of consent 04/120/CP (04/00076/OUTBS)
At The Aviemore Centre, Grampian Road, Aviemore

page 3

The decision was to call-in the application for the following reason:
The proposed development is of linked significance to a planning
application which was previously determined by the CNPA, as it
seeks to vary the time limits stipulated in the original consent.
The proposal is considered to raise issues of significance to the
aims of the National Park, particularly in terms of the social and
economic development of the area.

24. 11/111/CP - No Call-in

25. 11/112/CP - No Call-in

26. 11/113/CP - No Call-in

27. 11/114/CP - No Call-in

28. 11/115/CP - No Call-in

29. 11/116/CP - No Call-in
COMMENTING ON APPLICATIONS NOT CALLED-IN BY THE COMMITTEE

30. The Members wished to make comments to the Local Authorities on the following
Planning Application No's 11/095/CP, 11/107/CP, 11/109/CP, 11/112/CP, 11/113/CP &
11/115/CP. The planning officers noted these comments and were delegated with the
responsibility of whether or not to submit the comments to the Local Authorities.